Incorporating sex dolls into pornography raises complex ethical questions about consent, objectification, and societal influence. Since sex dolls are non-sentient, they cannot give consent, which distinguishes their use from depictions involving human performers. Critics argue that their portrayal in adult content might reinforce unrealistic standards of beauty and intimacy, potentially skewing viewers’ perceptions of real relationships. There is also concern that reliance on sex dolls in pornography could diminish the value of genuine human connection, promoting a transactional view of intimacy. Conversely, some argue that sex dolls can serve as ethical alternatives for performers, reducing risks associated with human actors, such as sexually transmitted infections or coercion. They may also provide a platform for exploring fantasies safely. However, ethical considerations extend beyond individual use to societal impacts—such as normalization of objectification and potential desensitization to real human intimacy. Transparency and responsible portrayal are crucial in mitigating harm. Ultimately, the use of sex dolls in pornography must be approached thoughtfully, balancing personal freedom with societal responsibility to promote healthy attitudes towards sexuality and human relationships.